The defendant is charged in the indictment with attempting to commit [specify crime charged]. For the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant intended to [specify elements of crime charged]; and
Second, the defendant did something that was a substantial step toward committing the crime.
A “substantial step” is conduct that strongly corroborated a defendant’s intent to commit the crime. To constitute a substantial step, a defendant’s act or actions must unequivocally demonstrate that the crime will take place unless interrupted by independent circumstances. Mere preparation is not a substantial step toward committing the crime.
Jurors do not need to agree unanimously as to which particular act or actions constituted a substantial step toward the commission of a crime.
Comment
This definition should follow the elements instruction for the substantive crime.
Where this Manual provides a model instruction covering attempt to commit a specific offense, such instruction should be used instead of this generic attempt instruction. This instruction is appropriate only when a defendant is accused of attempting to commit a crime for which there is no specific model instruction.
This Manual contains model instructions for attempt to commit the following specific offenses:
Instruction 7.2 Alien–Illegal Transportation or Attempted Transportation
Instruction 7.3 Alien–Harboring or Attempted Harboring
Instruction 7.5 Alien–Bringing or Attempting to Bring to the United States (Without Authorization)
Instruction 7.7 Alien–Deported Alien Reentering United States Without Consent–Attempt
Instruction 9.4 Attempted Bank Robbery
Instruction 9.5 Hobbs Act–Extortion or Attempted Extortion by Force
Instruction 9.6 Hobbs Act–Extortion or Attempted Extortion by Nonviolent Threat
Instruction 9.7 Hobbs Act–Extortion or Attempted Extortion Under Color of Official Right
Instruction 9.8 Hobbs Act–Robbery or Attempted Robbery
Instruction 12.3 Controlled Substance–Attempted Possession with Intent to Distribute
Instruction 12.7 Controlled Substance–Attempted Distribution or Manufacture
Instruction 12.9 Controlled Substance–Attempted Distribution to Person Under 21 Years
Instruction 12.11 Controlled Substance–Attempted Distribution in or Near School
Instruction 12.13 Controlled Substance–Attempted Employment of Minor to Violate Drug Laws
Instruction 13.2 Passing or Attempting to Pass Counterfeit Obligations
Instruction 13.8 Passing or Attempting to Pass Forged Endorsement on Treasury Check, Bond, or Security of United States
Instruction 15.38 Attempted Bank Fraud–Scheme to Deprive Bank of Intangible Right of Honest Services
Instruction 15.40 Attempted Bank Fraud–Scheme to Defraud by False Promises
Instruction 16.5 Attempted Murder
Instruction 17.5 Attempted Kidnapping–Foreign Official or Official Guest
Instruction 17.6 Attempted Kidnapping–Federal Officer of Employee
Instruction 18.1 Travel Act–Interstate or Foreign Travel in Aid of Racketeering Enterprise
Instruction 18.3 Financial Transaction or Attempted Transaction to Promote Unlawful Activity
Instruction 18.4 Laundering or Attempting to Launder Monetary Instruments
Instruction 18.5 Transporting or Attempting to Transport Funds to Promote Unlawful Activity
Instruction 18.6 Transporting or Attempting to Transport Monetary Instruments for the Purpose of Laundering
Instruction 18.8 Violent Crime or Attempted Violent Crime in Aid of Racketeering Enterprise
Instruction 20.2 and 20.4 Attempted Aggravated Sexual Abuse
Instruction 20.4 Attempted Aggravated Sexual Abuse–Administration of Drug, Intoxicant, or Other Substance
Instruction 20.6 Attempted Aggravated Sexual Abuse of Child
Instruction 20.8 Attempted Sexual Abuse–By Threat
Instruction 20.10 Attempted Sexual Abuse–Incapacity of Victim
Instruction 20.12 Attempted Sexual Abuse of Minor
Instruction 20.14 Attempted Sexual Abuse of Person in Official Detention
Instruction 20.27 Transportation or Attempted Transportation for Prostitution or Criminal Sexual Activity
Instruction 20.28 Persuading or Coercing to Travel in Prostitution or Sexual Activity
Instruction 20.29 Using or Attempting to Use the Mail or a Means of Interstate Commerce to Persuade or Coerce a Minor to Travel to Engage in Prostitution or Sexual Activity
Instruction 21.1 Smuggling or Attempting to Smuggle Goods
Instruction 21.2 Smuggling or Attempting to Smuggle Goods from the United States
Instruction 21.3 Passing or Attempting to Pass False Papers Through Customhouse
Instruction 22.7 Forcible or Attempted Rescue of Seized Property
Instruction 23.11 Attempted Mail Theft
Instruction 24.2 Arson or Attempted Arson
Instruction 24.5 Attempted Escape
“There is no general federal ‘attempt’ statute. A defendant therefore can only be found guilty of an attempt to commit a federal offense if the statute defining the offense also expressly proscribes an attempt.” (citations omitted). United States v. Hopkins, 703 F.2d 1102, 1104 (9th Cir. 1983). However, many federal statutes defining crimes also expressly proscribe attempts.
“[A]ttempt is a term that at common law requires proof that the defendant had the specific intent to commit the underlying crime and took some overt act that was a substantial step toward committing that crime.” United States v. Gracidas-Ulibarry, 231 F.3d 1188, 1192 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). To constitute a substantial step, a defendant’s ‘actions must cross the line between preparation and attempt by unequivocally demonstrating that the crime will take place unless interrupted by independent circumstances’.” United States v. Goetzke, 494 F.3d 1231, 1237 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Nelson, 66 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 1995)).
The “strongly corroborated” language in this instruction comes from United States v. Snell, 627 F.2d 186, 187 (9th Cir. 1980) (per curiam) (“A conviction for attempt requires proof of culpable intent and conduct constituting a substantial step toward commission of the crime that strongly corroborates that intent.”) and United States v. Darby, 857 F.2d 623, 625 (9th Cir. 1988) (same).
Jurors do not need to agree unanimously as to which particular act or actions constituted a substantial step toward the commission of a crime. United States v. Hofus, 598 F.3d 1171, 1176 (9th Cir. 2010).
“[A] person may be convicted of an attempt to commit a crime even though that person may have actually completed the crime.” United States v. Rivera-Relle, 333 F.3d 914, 921 (9th Cir. 2003).
Revised Dec 2023