Model Jury Instructions
Published on Model Jury Instructions (https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions)

Home > Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions > 15. Trademark > 15.31 Anti-Cybersquatting (15 U.S.C. § 1125(d))

15.31 Anti-Cybersquatting (15 U.S.C. § 1125(d))

15.31  Anti-Cybersquatting (15 U.S.C. § 1125(d))

Comment

            In 1999, Congress passed the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”). The ACPA “establishes civil liability for ‘cyberpiracy’ where a plaintiff proves that (1) the defendant registered, trafficked in, or used a domain name; (2) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a protected mark owned by the plaintiff; and (3) the defendant acted ‘with bad faith intent to profit from that mark.’” DSPT Int’l., Inc. v. Nahum, 624 F.3d 1213, 1218-19 (9th Cir. 2010). In addition, using in a domain name another’s protected mark “to get leverage in a business dispute” is sufficient to establish “bad faith intent.”  Id. at 1219-20.

 

Revised March 2024  

File: 
File 15.31_civil_rev_3_2024.docx [1]

Source URL: https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/699

Links
[1] https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/sites/default/files/WPD/15.31_civil_rev_3_2024.docx