... heard] [watched]] a recording that has been received in evidence. [Please listen to it very carefully.] Each of you [has been] [was] ... recording. However, bear in mind that the recording is the evidence, not the transcript. If you [hear] [heard] something different from ...
... early as possible to aid jurors in the understanding of the evidence, the standards to be applied and the law that must be applied to the ... and counsel on the issues to be presented and the types of evidence to be admitted, as well as maximizing the capacity to anticipate ...
... 6.8 SELF–DEFENSE The defendant has offered evidence of having acted in self-defense. Use of force is justified when a ... Pierre , 254 F.3d 872, 876 (9th Cir. 2001). When there is evidence of self-defense, an additional element should be added to the ...
... the following additional elements by a preponderance of the evidence: First, [the plaintiff faced a ... officials unless the record contains substantial evidence showing [that] their policies are an unnecessary or unjustified ...
... as a lawyer in the case, and [his] [her] words are not evidence. The only evidence in this case comes from witnesses who testify under oath on the ...
... as a lawyer in the case, and [his] [her] words are not evidence. The only evidence in this case comes from witnesses who testify under oath on the ...
... The defendant has offered evidence of having acted in self-defense. Use of force is justified when a ... , 254 F.3d 872, 876 (9th Cir. 2001). When there is evidence of self-defense, an additional element should be added to the ...
... the fact that [ insert fact noticed ], even though no evidence was presented on this point [,] [because this fact is of such common ... took judicial notice of a bank’s FDIC status because the evidence established that its status “was not subject to reasonable ...
... the fact that [ insert fact noticed ], even though no evidence was presented on this point[,] [because this fact is of such common ... took judicial notice of a bank’s FDIC status because the evidence established that its status "was not subject to reasonable dispute." ...
... The defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that: First, the defendant believed ... A preponderance of the evidence means that you must be persuaded that the things the defendant seeks ...