Search

Search results

1. 6.5 Reasonable Doubt—Defined

   ... arise from a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, or from lack of evidence.             If after a careful and impartial ...

2. 5.8 Necessity (Legal Excuse)

   ... The defendant must prove necessity by a preponderance of the evidence.  A preponderance of the evidence means that you must be persuaded that the things the defendant seeks ...

3. 6.6 Necessity (Legal Excuse)

   ... The defendant must prove necessity by a preponderance of the evidence. A preponderance of the evidence means that you must be persuaded that the things the defendant seeks ...

4. 5.9 Justification (Legal Excuse)

   ... defendant must prove justification by a preponderance of the evidence.  A preponderance of the evidence means that you must be persuaded that the things the defendant seeks ...

5. 6.7 Justification (Legal Excuse)

   ... defendant must prove justification by a preponderance of the evidence. A preponderance of the evidence means that you must be persuaded that the things the defendant seeks ...

6. 3.5 Reasonable Doubt—Defined

   ... arise from a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, or from lack of evidence.  If after a careful and impartial consideration of all the ...

7. 9.30 Particular Rights—Fourteenth Amendment—Pretrial Detainee's Claim re Conditions of Confinement/Medical Care

   ... each of the following elements by a preponderance of the evidence:              First, the defendant made an ... officials unless the record contains substantial evidence showing [that] their policies are an unnecessary or unjustified ... 547), and second, the record did not contain “substantial evidence showing [that the prison’s] policies are an unnecessary or ...

8. 9.11A Particular Rights—First Amendment—Convicted Prisoner/Pretrial Detainee’s Claim of Retaliation

   ... the following additional elements by a preponderance of the evidence:  1.     the plaintiff was engaged in conduct ... chronology of events may be considered as circumstantial evidence of a causal connection between the adverse action and the ...

9. 15.18 Infringement—Likelihood of Confusion—Factors—Sleekcraft Test (15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1) and 1125(a))

   ... of confusion, because you must consider all relevant evidence. As you consider the likelihood of confusion you should examine the ... not focus on any one factor and to consider all relevant evidence in assessing likelihood of confusion. See Kendall-Jackson Winery ...

10. 11.13 Age Discrimination—Damages—Back Pay—Mitigation

    ... and the amount of back pay by a preponderance of the evidence. 2.          Mitigation of Back Pay ... has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a reduction should be made and the amount by which the award ...

Pages