... must prove the following elements by a preponderance of the evidence: First, the defendant [ name ] purposely or knowingly used ... case, the plaintiffs must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the officer s ”—plural—“used excessive ...
... the reasons given for the opinion, and all the other evidence in the case. You also should [pay careful attention as to ... the reasons given for the opinion, and all the other evidence in the case. Other opinion testimony you [will hear] [have ...
... brings against the defendant. The indictment is not evidence and does not prove anything. The ... silent and never has to prove innocence or present any evidence. [To help you follow the evidence, I will ...
... brings against the defendant. The indictment is not evidence and does not prove anything. The defendant has pleaded not guilty ... silent and never has to prove innocence or present any evidence. [In order to help you follow the evidence, I will now give you a ...
... [duress] [coercion] [compulsion] by a preponderance of the evidence. A preponderance of the evidence means that you must be persuaded that the things the defendant seeks ...
... for section 1028A). Both direct and circumstantial evidence can establish that a defendant knew that the means of identification ... Id . at 1120-22. If the case involves circumstantial evidence of knowledge, consider the following instruction from Doe at 1121: ...
... burden of proving lack of heat of passion). If there is evidence that the defendant acted in self-defense, see Instruction 6.8 (Self-Defense). Evidence that the defendant acted upon a sudden quarrel or heat of passion ...
... of confusion, because you must consider all relevant evidence. As you consider the likelihood of confusion you should examine the ... not focus on any one factor and to consider all relevant evidence in assessing likelihood of confusion. See Kendall-Jackson Winery ...
... name of defendant ] was false. There must be additional evidence—either the testimony of another person or other evidence—that tends to support the testimony of falsity. The other evidence, ...
... [ name of defendant ] was false. There must be additional evidence–either the testimony of another person or other evidence–which tends to support the testimony of falsity. The other evidence, ...